Benaissa process: Who dispensed with the condom, is your own fault?
I beg your pardon? Are you crazy? The man with whom no-angel singer Nadja Benaissa had unprotected traffic should be in the dock? After all, he did not use a condom So he should have known he could get infected. This is what the newspaper comments today. When I hear these demands, I get angry.
The argument of the people who demand it: The disease AIDS has existed for 30 years, who has unprotected sexual intercourse, just expect to get infected with the HI virus. Unfortunately, fewer people do that again today: many think that the virus can be treated well today, they do not protect themselves. As a result, the number of infections in Europe is rising again. So far I can follow: Of course you should definitely use a condom, if you do not know his partner and his health. And of course, the topic of contraception should not be left to the woman alone. If you do not feel like condoms, act at your own risk.
The case, however, is completely different as soon as one of them has an infectious disease and is aware of it. In this case, he (or she) has the duty to inform his counterpart either about his illness, insist on the use of a condom or to renounce sexual intercourse. Does he not do this, he accepts that the other is contagious.
The men in the bed of Nadja Benaissa were all unaware. Nadja Benaissa was not. She knew she had the deadly virus in her and the danger that she could infect her partners with it. She had a duty to inform the men. She says that herself, she is honest: "I should have dealt with the topic more responsibly."
What do you think about the case Nadja Benaissa? Join the ChroniquesDuVasteMonde.com community!
